When Drills go Live


Let’s Not Be Fooled Again:

Examining When Drills Are Used to Commit False Flags

With Operation Jade Helm 15, a joint military exercise set to take part in nine U.S. states this summer, many people believe that the drill may go “live” and be used as another ramp up of the existing slow creep towards more martial law. Is there any reason to get worried? Yes!, and here’s why.

9/11/2001 and concurrent drills

Immediately before and on day of 9/11/2001, NORAD and various Intelligence and policing agencies in the U.S. were running multiple drills that virtually simulated the exact terrorism events themselves, or kept personnel distracted from reacting in time to thwart the attacks.

Some of these drills were:

wtc_target1999_sVIGILANT GUARDIAN: Described as “an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide”; as a “simulated air war”; and as “an air defense exercise simulating an attack on the United States.” Exercise Includes Simulated Hijacking – Vanity Fair reports that the “day’s exercise” is “designed to run a range of scenarios, including a ‘traditional’ simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum.” [VANITY FAIR, 8/1/2006]

GLOBAL GUARDIAN: This drill was both a command post and a field training exercise, and is based around a fictitious scenario designed to test the ability of Stratcom and its component forces to deter a military attack against the US. Hundreds of military personnel are involved. This annual exercise gets bumped up to run in September when it normally runs during October and November. Other descriptions of the drills entailed exercises based around the scenario of a rogue nation attacking the United States with nuclear weapons. At Barksdale, according to journalists Eric Schmitt and Thom Shanker, air crews taking part in the exercise have been “pulling nuclear bombs and missiles out of their heavily guarded storage sites and loading them aboard B-52s” this morning. Real, live nuclear weapons are being used, but “their triggers [are] not armed.” [SCHMITT AND SHANKER, 2011, PP. 22]

TRIPOD: This exercise, which had been scheduled months earlier but like Global Guardian, was reschedule for September, “is intended to test how well New York’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) can administer treatment in response to a biological-terrorism attack (see September 12, 2001). [NEW YORK MAGAZINE, 10/15/2001; GIULIANI, 2002, PP. 355] Pier 92, located just over four miles north-northwest of the World Trade Center, has been set up as a model distribution station where the simulated victims will be treated.”

CIA SPONSORED EXERCISE: On the morning of September 11 2001, within minutes of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the CIA had been running “a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building”. The simulation was held at the CIA Chantilly Virginia Reconnaissance Office. [See: The London 7/7 Mock Terror Drill: What Relationship to the Real Time Terror Attacks?]

These are just a few of the many drills that day. [For a full list See: History Commons: 9/11 Timeline]

7/7 London bombings mimic same day drills

On 7 July 2005 London bombings a series of attacks targeting civilians using the public transport system occurred during the morning rush hour. Fifty-six people were killed and more than 700 were injured in the attack. Officially these attacks were attributed to four Islamic suicide bombers.

peter-power-panorama-london-under-attack-cvOn the day of the bombings, Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, a private firm on contract to the London Metropolitan Police, gave interviews on BBC Radio 5 Live and ITV saying that his company helped organized a bombing scenario that coincided with the 7/7 London bombings. “At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now,” Power told the BBC. [See: London Underground Bombing ‘Exercises’ Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack]

Also, More than a year before the 7/7/2005 attacks, on the 16th of May 2004, an edition of the BBC ONE Panorama program broadcasted a mock exercise, imagining what would happen if a terrorist-attack was executed in London, in the NEAR FUTURE, consisting of three explosions on tube-trains in the London Underground, and one explosion on a road vehicle.

The probability of the 7/7/2005 drill and attack coinciding, without being planned to coincide, in a 10 year period is ONE chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, according to John Hill director of the excellent film on the topic: 7/7: Ripple Effect. [For the full film see: 7/7: Ripple Effect]

The Boston Bombing and Urban Shield’s backpack bomb drills

tanandblackguys-bostonPrior to the Boston Marathon Bombing on Patriots Day, 2013, the DHS funded “Operation Urban Shield” a drill for the Boston Area. This exercise which was “intended to take place during the summer, according to the Boston Globe —so closely resembled what actually occurred the day of the bombings that even the mainstream media source responsible for bringing it to light could not help but point out this incredible “coincidence.”

“The drill’s scenario had been carefully planned: A terrorist group prepared to hurt vast numbers of people around Boston would leave backpacks filled with explosives at Faneuil Hall, the Seaport District, and in other towns, spreading waves of panic and fear,” explains the Boston Globe. [See: Boston Bombing False Terror Drills]

Besides officials claiming that the drill was scheduled for later that year, it does looks like a live drill was taking place on the day itself. According to Alastair Stevenson they (the event organizers) were announcing drills going on the day of the Boston Bombing. “At the start at the event, at the Athlete’s Village, there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village at the start. There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we shouldn’t be concerned and that it was just a drill. And maybe it was just a drill, but I’ve never seen anything like that — not at any marathon that I’ve ever been to. You know, that just concerned me that that’s the only race that I’ve seen in my life where they had dogs sniffing for explosions, and that’s the only place where there had been explosions.” [See: Boston Marathon Eyewitness Verifies Drill]

Drills used as cover for False Flags

One might ask that when a drill happens near or on the same day as a terrorism event, and, if it almost replicates the event itself, or helps hinder an effective countermeasure, is it purely coincidental or should we consider a more troubling explanation—that the drill itself is being used as an operational cover to facilitate the terrorist event or events?

The latter is the more probable explanation for a number of reasons:

  1. Drills keep proper and effective counterterrorism measures from taking place by causing confusion.For instance, on 9/11/2001 CNN reports that Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Victoria Clarke, who is in the Pentagon during the attacks, will recall: “There were lots of false signals out there. There were false hijack squawks, and a great part of the challenge was sorting through what was a legitimate threat and what wasn’t.” [CNN, 6/17/2004] Also, tape recordings capture NEADS personnel in the background trying to make sense of things: “Is this explosion part of that that we’re lookin’ at now on TV?”… “And there’s a possible second hijack also—a United Airlines“… “Two planes?” Another person replies, “Then this is a damned messed-up input!” [SPENCER, 2008, PP. 84] “Input” refers to a simulations input, as part of a training exercise. These are just a few of the many examples of confusion, which hindered an effective response by the military.
  2. Drills act as an operation cover for the coordination of false flags and act as foil in case any of its perpetrators are caught Though this probable explanation is rarely, if ever, acknowledged as reasonable by the mainstream media or public officials, it is part and parcel standard operating procedure in black operations. [See: False Flag Preparations]
  3. Drills set up the conditions for keeping emergency or military personal in positions where they cannot intervene effectively(like the military pilots on 9/11 who were directed over the Atlantic Ocean away from the action), or in places where they will be best utilized after the main event happen (FEMA personnel where on the ground in New York on Sept 10, 2010 and were used to help secure the site and the evidence.)
Okay, but, what is the motive for the government to commit a false flag?

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) outlines in their document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” that they needed a “New Pearl Harbor” to start the next phase of American expansionism. The actual people that were in charge of defenses on 9/11, including Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, were key founders this group, thus giving us the people with the power— and motive—to carry out such an event.

Conversely, to consider the government’s version of what happened —that 19 Arabs (without good flying skills) outsmarted the entire military industrial complex because they “hate our freedoms” as Dick Cheney phrased it, is truly patently absurd. Also, the Arab perpetrators would have had to know that attacking a civilian icon would bring the wrath of the biggest army in history into their regions. Does this make sense?

Operation Jade Helm 15: preparation for tyranny?

With Operation Jade Helm 15 scheduled to start July 15 to September 15th this year, the U.S. is setting the stage for an event to go live. Some of Jade Helm’s exercises will put special force members in civilian areas and at night, with some pretending to be civilians. The military’s stated objectives for the exercises are to prepare the troops for overseas missions, but if that is the case then why are military asked to wear civilian clothes and to see if they can operate incognito, a highly dubious proposition in a Middle Eastern country.

Jade-Helm-Master-the-human-domainThough these drills are justified by the military and police as readiness and preparedness exercises which are essential to coordinate inter-agency response, it would seem that a good percentage of them tend to by hijacked by terrorist within.

The evidence is overwhelming that when these drills go ‘live’ it sets into motion a whole series of predictable outcomes that will continue to be used to further destroy our civil liberties and institutions and be used as excuses for the U.S. to commit war crimes on innocent states.

With more and more of these militarized drills happening every day we are sitting on a theoretical and potential time bomb.

Three Judges “Astonished” At Now Seeing The Collapse of Building 7 (14 years later)



In the interview above, after the court case, Harrit says,

“We got the opportunity, for once, to present a video of World Trade Centre 7 collapsing, in court, … at that time I recognised a state of astonishment among the three judges…. I understand, as usual, that none of them had heard or seen the collapse of Building 7 before.”

“I’m just an ordinary, very ordinary retired scientist from the University of Copenhagen who just can’t stand (when) the fundamental laws of Galileo and Sir Isaac Newton are not respected in the public domain.”

The former Prime Minister of Australia, Malcolm Fraser, was also unaware that a third building had collapsed on September 11, 2001 (when I interviewed him last year). Regardless of the outcome of this libel case, the collapse of this Building 7 has been deliberatedly “kept” from the public.

Christopher Bollyn comes to Oakland to discuss his book “Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed the World”


9/11 Researcher Christopher Bollyn to Speak Live in Oakland, CA

Christopher Bollyn and Professor Jones look at 9-11 data at BYU in the spring of 2006.  Dr. Jones and Bollyn were both attacked in August-September 2006.  The evidence indicates that they were attacked because of their research into the use of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center.

Christopher Bollyn and Professor Jones look at 9-11 data at BYU in the spring of 2006. Dr. Jones and Bollyn were both attacked in August-September 2006. The evidence indicates that they were attacked because of their research into the use of Thermite in the destruction of the World Trade Center.

Christopher Bollyn is an American journalist who has investigated the events of 9-11.  He helped Professor Steven E. Jones in the spring and summer of 2006, when Jones found solid evidence of Thermite in the dust of the Twin Towers.  The discovery and discussion of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center led to serious trouble for both Jones and Bollyn.  – See more at: www.bollyn.com.

In August 2006, Bollyn was attacked at his home in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, by a heavily-armed three-man team of undercover police that had been prowling around his house for several days in a row.  The result of the police assault on Bollyn was that he was falsely charged with assault and resisting arrest; both misdemeanor charges.  He pled innocent and went through a four-day trial in which the police openly lied and presented false evidence.  Bollyn’s evidence, on the other hand, was not allowed to be presented and his expert witness was not allowed to testify.  After the seriously flawed trial, Bollyn was found guilty of both charges and faced sentencing from the same judge who had overseen the trial.

Rather than submitting themselves to injustice the Bollyn family left their home near Chicago and moved to Europe in June 2007.  He then wrote a set of books based on his 9-11 research entitled Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

Bollyn will discuss information in his new book “Solving 911: The Deception that Changed the World” this February 24, 2015 at 7PM at the Humanist Hall, 390, 27th Street, in Oakland, CA. To buy tickets go here: noliesradio.org. This event is believed to sell out quickly so act now!

2014 NCA911TA “9/11 Truth Film Fest” Photos

2014 Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance “9/11 TRUTH FILM FESTIVAL” Photo Album by Truth Troubadour Vic Sadot

These are mostly screen-shots taken from the No Lies Radio live-stream archive of the “9/11 Truth Film Festival” held at the elegant Grand Lake Theater on 9/11/14 in Oakland, CA. The event was organized by the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance. The live stream will be available for 30 days for a small donation at www.noliesradio.org/filmfestival





The 9/11 Museum’s Biggest Oversight:
No Mention of WTC Building 7

The 9/11 Museum’s Biggest Oversight: No Mention of WTC Building 7

by Les Jamieson

Hello friends,

Les-JamiesonI toured the recently opened 9/11 Museum last night. There is quite a bit to report. The size and scale of the building and many sections are actually impressive. One can see how the general public will be very taken by the entire presentation, and therefore, take what they see as truth.

However, if the original intent of the museum was to pay homage to those who perished, the exhibits are far off the mark. Instead, the creators have co-opted the tragedy to substantiate the official narrative. The museum just solidifies the shock & awe of the events of 9/11, and gives the public a visual and auditory experience that will be firmly etched in their memory far into the future.

There are exhibits on each of the towers. There are photos of their original construction. There were sections of steel columns, elevator parts, and parts of the foundation. There were displays of personal items of those who perished. There were many audio recordings with slide shows being projected of pictures of victims, survivors, and onlookers in a state of terror. There are film clips, and transcripts of conversations from that day. There is an ambulance and a fire truck, which show the damage from the debris. There are videos of the towers on fire. There are even photos of people jumping. Then there are even large videos of the demolition of each tower. But by the time people view these, they’ve been thoroughly distracted and emotionally overcome by the magnitude of the horror people experienced that day, so they cannot recognize the implications of the disintegration and free-fall of 110 stories of steel-framed structures.

WTCmemorialJune2012There is a section on Osama Bin Laden, the alleged hijackers, Kaleed Sheikh Mohammed, and Al Qaeda. There were two film clips of hijackers passing through the airports. However, the one from Dulles has no time stamp and I think the only other one is actually taken from Portland, ME, not Logan Airport. Nevertheless, people viewing this display were shown exactly who the official narrative wants the blame to be attributed to.

To my surprise, there was even a small section on the public’s questioning of the events. This included photos of people calling for investigations, protestors claiming 9/11 was an inside job, and the cover of Popular Mechanics which supposedly debunked all those “conspiracy theories”. At least the museum planners can attempt to say they were thorough in addressing all of the “focus groups”. But this small section did nothing to go into the broad scope of alternative research based on science and journalistic analysis. If only they had a copy of “The New Pearl Harbor” by David Ray Griffin next to a copy of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses“.

Then, of course, there were quilts, photos, and artifacts that good hearted Americans created in tribute to those who suffered and died. There were photos and statements about how we all came together and rose above the tragedy because we’re resilient and won’t be defeated. After all, we have to keep up our “American exceptionalism”. The framers of the official account took an unspeakable tragedy and turned it into a cause for patriotism.

There was a digital presentation showing the flight paths. There where photos of Shanksville and the Pentagon. But by now you may be noticing there’s a glaring omission to this report. There is nothing on WTC7! I still can’t believe it when the museum covers so much of everything else.

No pictures or mention of WTC Building 7 is a blatant example of the 9/11 Memorial Museum keeping important information from museum goers

No pictures or mention of WTC Building 7 is a blatant example of the 9/11 Memorial Museum keeping important information from museum goers

To add further weight to this proposition, just think how the truth about WTC7 actually changes the meaning of everything in the museum! Just think how the entire official narrative caves in on itself. It boggles the mind…

The alternative flyer by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is an essential educational tool. The cover looks similar to the official pamphlet, except it says “9/11 Reality: Welcome to the other story about 9/11.” This is the Visitor Guide For Truth Seekers. With the thousands of people visiting the 9/11 Memorial and 9/11 Museum daily, distributing these flyers is a huge opportunity to open the eyes of the public. This is our chance to counter the deliberate distortion of history. I urge us all to meet the challenge.

(Editor’s Note: The headline above was in response to a June 5, 2014 article in  Newsweek called “The 9/11 Museum’s Biggest Oversight: The World Trade Center’s Neighborhood“, written by Alexander Nazaryan, which laments the museum’s oversight of including any mention of the historical arabic roots of the part of New York City where the museum now resides. However, we think the oversight of mentioning WTC Building 7, a 47-story tall building that suddenly collapses at free fall speed on 9/11, even though it wasn’t hit by a plane, is the more egregious example of the museum omitting evidence, especially evidence that could lead to people questioning the official narrative.)


Faux 9/11 Memorial Museum Flyer Co-opts Regular MSM Programming

Faux 9/11 Memorial Museum Flyer Co-opts Regular MSM Programming

Gotta love those pesky ‘truthers’ for getting under the skin of MSM talking heads.  And, this time we specifically give a shout out to the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth whose faux 9/11 Memorial Museum brochure caused a flustered Jack Tapper, the host of CNN’s The Lead with Jack Trapper, to feel the need to remind viewers that “the families of the approximately 3,000 people killed at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and in a field in Pennsylvania were killed by Islamic terrorists with al-Qaeda”  over and over and over again. Yes, close your eyes, click your heels, and repeat after me….

You must see it to believe it.

jack tapper blast 9/1l Truther 9/11 Memorial Museum faux flyer

And, CNN wasn’t alone in covering this story. The Washington Times, The Raw Story, The Village Voice and Breit Bart, to name a few, all gave a collective gasp at AE9/11truth.org’s audacity.

All pretty incredible for such a simple guerrilla tactic as handing out four-color flyers with willing people to distribute them to museum attendees.

Let that be a lesson for activists. It doesn’t take much to co-opt regular scheduled brainwashing,… err, programing.

For a full analysis of this Orwellian story see the excellent article by Craig McGee on AE9/11 Truth’s website: CNN’s “‘Yellow Journalism’ Rating Hits All-Time High.” 

AE 9/11 Truth’s Flyer (on Right) compared to the original:


In Memory of 9/11 Researchers
Michael C. Ruppert and John Judge

in-memory of John Judge and Michael C. Ruppert
It is with great sadness that the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance marks the passing of two of the finest researchers into the events of 9/11 — Michael C. Ruppert and John Judge.

Michael C. Ruppert
was a former LA Detective, whistleblower and investigative journalist, and one of the first people to speak out on the inconsistencies of the official story of 9/11. In later years he wrote extensively about 9/11 on his website, From the Wilderness. He also wrote one of the most comprehensive books on the subject, “Crossing The Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil.” Ruppert died on April 13, 2014, of an apparent suicide.

Here Michael is interviewed by Alison Weiner, Media Mayhem host on the subject of 9/11

Northern California 9/11 Truth singer-songwriter, Vic Sadot, dedicates the song “Blowback or Bloody Treason” to Michael Ruppert

John Judge
was one of the foremost researchers into the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers and MLK. He was the founder and director of Coalition on Political Assassinations (COPA), a group dedicated to researching and exposing these events. Judge also spoke frequently on the inconsistencies of 9/11 to audiences around the country as an insider. Having grown up in a Pentagon family he describes details of missile batteries around the Pentagon and why the planes on 9/11 were allowed in restricted air space unhindered. Judge died on April 9, 2014, in what looks like complications from an earlier stroke.

Here John explains his background and analysis of events of those day:

For more about John Judge:
In Memory of John Judge – Godfather and Pioneer of Alternative Media

And, here Bonnie Faulkner from KPFA Guns and Butter Remembers both Judge and Ruppert:

The Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Univeralists (at 1924 Cedar Street, Berkeley, CA) will be holding a film series on two separate nights in honor of both Judge and Ruppert. On Thursday, May 8, 2014 7:00 pm – 10:00 pm, will be a film series in remembrance of John Judge Films shown are: John Judge in 1994: “The Hidden History of the United States: Who Really Runs America? – Part One: from The Eclectic Point of View (1:59:39). After a brief intermission, we will show the short (38:23) “Closing Remarks” by John Judge to the 50th Anniversary Conference on President Kennedy’s Murder , which was presented on November 24, 2013 in Dallas, Texas. The theme was “Fifty Years in Denial is Enough: Free the Files! Find the Truth!

…and, on Friday, May 23, 2014 7:00 pm – 10:00 pm, will be a film series in remembrance of Michael C. Ruppert. Film show: “THE GREAT AWAKENING” (1:17:43) – The Great Awakening Speech empowers and invites humanity to change the way it thinks and perceives reality. On 9-11-2011 Mike Ruppert, the ‘tracker of truth’ , spoke in Seattle. He evoked a powerful, inspiring, selfless message of incorruptible truth and awareness; shining a bright light in an age of darkness and deceit.

Thank you for being speakers of truth in a time of lies. You will be missed.

Condolences to Michael and John’s families.

2014 9/11 Truth Film Festival

9-11TruthFilmFestival-2014Coming September 11

The 2014 9/11 Truth Film Festival:
“Exposing The Greatest Fraud on Earth!”

Join Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance at the beautiful Grand Lake Theatre in Oakland for this one day film festival where we critically examine the most world transforming event of our times. What does the event of 9/11 mean for you and the world? Join others who are attempting to shine a light on this crucial moment in history.


Noam Chomsky’s “Willful Ignorance of 9/11” by Kevin Ryan

Kevin Ryan Responds to Noam Chomsky Ridicule of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founded by Richard Gage: “Willful Ignorance” in Dig Within Blog

Noam Chomsky recently engaged in a smear campaign against Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth by misrepresenting what their efforts are, what they actually say, and their size, which he called “miniscule”. After some 30 email  correspondences with Noam Chomsky, author-researcher Kevin Ryan has regretfully had to conclude that Chomsky has not availed himself of information about 9/11 that is readily available to everyone after these many years, including the information sent to Noam Chomsky by Kevin Ryan. That includes his new book titled “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”.

Kevin Ryan calls Noam Chomsky’s dismissal of 9/11 research a position of “willful ignorance”. In his Florida speech Noam Chomsky responded to a question about World Trade Center Building 7 by claiming that he did not to know enough about the basic laws of physics to evaluate the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01, saying that he would defer to the authority of people with credentials. 

In Dig Within, Kevin Ryan Ryan wrote that Chomsky made “an attempt to belittle, and downplay the sacrifices of, people seeking the truth”. Ryan reveals what Chomsky’s gate-keeper game is all about since he has a long history of dismissing deep political conspiracies going back to the JFK murder-coup of 1963. Chomsky supported the basic findings of the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone. Kevin Ryan is co-founder of The Journal of 9/11 Studies and has a new book out titled “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”

Ryan states, “I’ve copied Chomsky on more than two peer-reviewed scientific articles in mainstream journals that describe evidence for demolition at the WTC… Chomsky acknowledged receiving the book in August and wrote to me that he was ‘pleased to have a copy of the book, and hope to be able to get to it before too long’.”


The Huffington Post ran an article by Ashley Alman on 11-26-13 titled: “Here’s The Video To Share With Anybody Who Still Buys Into 9/11 Truther Stuff”. The writer uses the video posted by the person who posed the question to Noam Chomsky, Bob Tuskin, without crediting him or covering his commentary at his video.

Bob Tuskin YouTube Channel, Oct 18, 2013 – Florida 9/11 Truth activist Bob Tuskin poses a question to Noam Chomsky. He and his movement get ridiculed by Chomsky, but no rational response to the question posed was given. Rather than discuss the scientific points made in recent years by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Chomsky calls AE911Truth a “miniscule group”.

This avoidance of questions and the use of a haughty anti-intellectual engagement of the matters under debate has been going on for a long time. Such methodology only leads to speculation about what Chomsky must really think and whether he is under threats or if he is simply a “Left Gatekeeper” used to make certain topics “taboo” to keep them out of legitimate analysis of pivotal events. 


Kevin Ryan, author of “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”. “Kevin Ryan is the co-editor of 9/11 Studies and a whistleblower from Underwriters Laboratories. He has contributed to many books and scientific articles on the subject of 9/11, and has made presentations around the U.S. and Canada. He has appeared on National Public Radio, Air America Radio, Pacifica Radio, C-SPAN Book TV, and Colorado Public Television.” Kevin Ryan’s blog is titled “Dig Within”.

Related links from N CA 9/11 Truth Alliance member, singer-songwriter Vic Sadot


Vic Sadot Music Report: Noam Chomsky & 9/11 “BLOWBACK OR BLOODY TREASON” Questions – “NOAM CHOMSKY & The WILLFUL IGNORANCE OF 9/11”. Kevin Ryan responds to recent Chomsky remarks in Florida ridiculing Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth as a “tiny” group. Vic Sadot Music Report aimed a Broadside Ballad at Chomsky with a post of the BLOWBACK OR BLOODY TREASON music video from  TRUTH TROUBADOUR YouTube Channel featured in the post on the Kevin Ryan exposé of Noam Chomsky’s specious complaints about people who continue to look into 9/11 and demand accountability.